Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Topics pertaining to SRM usage, usability and management
Forum rules
1) This is a user forum for Synology users to share experience/help out each other: if you need direct assistance from the Synology technical support team, please use the following form:
https://myds.synology.com/support/suppo ... p?lang=enu
2) To avoid putting users' DiskStation at risk, please don't paste links to any patches provided by our Support team as we will systematically remove them. Our Support team will provide the correct patch for your Synology model.
SpivR
Trainee
Trainee
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:40 am

Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby SpivR » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:00 am

Will we see a converge of software features between SRM and DSM?

DSM has a lot of non-NAS specific features that I would think the Synology Router (especially the 2600 version with faster cpu and more ram) should be able to handle.

For example, DSM supports Docker and there are many docker vm modules available, but there is no official Docker support for SRM.
User avatar
Rusty1281
Virtuoso
Virtuoso
Posts: 1217
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:51 pm

Re: Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby Rusty1281 » Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:25 am

There is already a nice number of 3rd party apps for SRM, but running Docker on a router is maybe not something that we will see in the near future. For example there is a Plex server installation that you can run on 2600 model (almost out of the box).
Synology DS412+ (4x3TB WD red - RAID 5) | Synology DS211j (2x2TB WD green - RAID1) | RT1900AC
prdlik
I'm New!
I'm New!
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:39 am

Re: Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby prdlik » Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:22 am

I would be happy, if the router does router´s functions on 100%. This is its job. If I want NAS, I will by NAS.
Last edited by prdlik on Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Babylonia
Enlightened
Enlightened
Posts: 483
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:47 am

Re: Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby Babylonia » Mon Jun 19, 2017 10:41 am

@prdlik
Yes, I can fully understand.

There is an economic reason for Synology itself to NOT implement the same packages and usability as for DSM.
For best profit as for a companies point of view and to NOT concurrence with its own products. Don't give the same possibilities.
prdlik
I'm New!
I'm New!
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:39 am

Re: Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby prdlik » Mon Jun 19, 2017 12:20 pm

For me it is issue of stability. Every another non core function brings risk of nonstability. Look at DSM - very nice OS, but many different functions, many updates to fix something what was working fine before. So I hope that Synology will focus on router´s functions like better reporting, intrusion prevention etc. and don´t waste time with things that NAS with DSM can do for me better.
NigelL
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 3:20 pm

Re: Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby NigelL » Mon Jun 19, 2017 3:26 pm

prdlik wrote:For me it is issue of stability. Every another non core function brings risk of nonstability. Look at DSM - very nice OS, but many different functions, many updates to fix something what was working fine before. So I hope that Synology will focus on router´s functions like better reporting, intrusion prevention etc. and don´t waste time with things that NAS with DSM can do for me better.


I completely agree. If they have to add more features then these should be Router-type features. E.g. A "mesh" network function for two (or more) connected Routers, such as the Ubiquiti AmpliFi system, would be very useful :D
SpivR
Trainee
Trainee
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:40 am

Re: Will SRM ever converge with DSM?

Postby SpivR » Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:55 pm

If DSM and SRM were converged (unified codebase), and hardware-specific functions were just loadable modules (NAS support, Wi-Fi support, VPN support, router features) the end result COULD (with proper software development methodology) be more supportable, more stable, and more flexible.

Again, if SRM and DSM were the same, then the user could choose to load additional modules or not, depending upon performance, memory, and needs.

I don't own a NAS, there are some module for DSM that are lightweight (low memory, low CPU usage) and I would like the option to be able to load some of them on the Router, If I choose.

For intrusion prevention, I think Synology will need to do much better than porting a Unix utility and adding a limited GUI front-end. It almost does more harm than good (at least in the current implementation on Synology it is pretty worthless and probably simpler if it didn't exist at all.)

Remember, at it's core, DSM and SRM are just hacked limited builds of BusyBox Linux. The value of Synology is the added modules and custom features layered on top with a decent GUI alternative to pure command line.

Return to “Installation and Configuration”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest