3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

A DSM update includes Directory Server, LDAP Client, Remote Folder, Virtual Drive, Syslog Server, Mac OS X Lion Support, Photo Station 5, Google Cloud Print, UPnP Router Support, DSM mobile, CalDAV server, and along with other software enhancements.

3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:51 am

I have tried upgrading to the 3.2 beta for my DS1511, have tried both downloading the beta file from my mac and PC, then uploading to the DSM and both occasions it starts the transfer, then halts stating that the upload file is probably corrupt.

Has anyone else found this, can anyone firm the firmware file is safe?

Adam
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby deerpark » Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:16 am

I don't know if this is the case here but Synology recommends uploading the file over http, not https because the upload might fail. So if you haven't already, try http.
deerpark
Apprentice
Apprentice
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:02 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:57 am

Thanks for the advice.
Ive never had a problem in the past, but I will certainly give it a go later.
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:18 pm

Just checked and it was already being uploaded over http.

Something to point out, I currently have no Internet connection, could that affect anything?
Any advice from synology?
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby steuben » Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:46 pm

adam1v wrote:Just checked and it was already being uploaded over http.

Something to point out, I currently have no Internet connection, could that affect anything?
Any advice from synology?


I was having similar problems and Synology advised me thusly:

1. If the computer to connect has wifi, please disable it for the duration of the test.
2. Please set the IP address on your computer to 169.254.1.1. The subnet mask should be 255.255.0.0. It will not be necessary to set a default gateway or DNS address.
3. Please unplug the Ethernet cable from the DiskStation and wait for 30 seconds. Plug a straight through Ethernet cable into your computer's LAN port and the DiskStation's LAN port. Allow several minutes for the DiskStation to assign itself an IP address.

*Please note that you will not need to use a crossover cable for this.*

Then proceed with update via DSM.

If that does not work, You can try clearing your internet browser cache. Also verify that the update file is on the local hard disk.


I did none of this, however, because I reset my Synology (keeping the data intact) and then installed the .pat via Synology Assistant from 'scratch,' which worked.
Daniel Alex Finkelstein
Ph.D. ABD - Computer Science - Computer Architecture
http://www.arsarchitectura.org

DS1511+ RAID5 5x 2TB Seagate 7200.11 DSM 4.0-2228 2x1Gb LACP
CS407 RAID5 4x 1TB Seagate 7200.11 DSM 3.1-1632 1Gb
steuben
Novice
Novice
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:34 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Wed Aug 10, 2011 6:12 pm

Thanks for your help.
Gave the instructions a try but got the same error :/
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:14 pm

Just put all the settings back, i.e the ip address back to normal and I can no longer browse the mapped shares.
There appears to be an issue resolving tge host name, ie \\diskstationname doesn't open the shares (when it did before), but \\ipaddress does show the shares.

Any ideas?
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:09 pm

To clear up the above post, the subnet mask was set to 255.255.0.0 (so was missing a .255).

Im still very keen to get the beta firmware installed, if anyone else has any other suggestions?
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby mr-user » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:37 am

Same issue here.
Eventually it worked !!!

Here is what happened to me:
- I applied the update about 6 times.
- Each attempt looked like it was successful but every time I checked teh DSM version it was still showing teh previous version of DSM (i.e. not the current BEAT version)
- I performed some reboots of the DS1511 via the DSM > RESTART command hoping this would somehow assist. I then re-applied teh updates to teh DSM-BETA. Still no good.
- I then decided to turn off teh DS1511 via the power button on front. Then turned power back on.
- The DS1511 then booted up and showed teh new version of the DSM-BETA.

Have now been using teh new DSM-BEAT for about a week.

Hope thsi helps.
mr-user
I'm New!
I'm New!
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:53 am

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:30 am

not really, as this would only get to "uploading the file" before giving the error message.
I've now searched a bit more and think it could be related to the lack of free space on the internal flash memory (im only guessing here).

Im not confident with telnet, but if it is a memory issue, i'll go through and delete some unused languages or something.
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:29 pm

Just ran df -h in telnet and there's 238mb free in dev/md0

I assume this is where it's trying to unpack the 174mb firmware?

Can someone tell me the necessary command to browse said directory, list all files and delete the unwanted?

Adam
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby maxxfi » Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:29 pm

To learn to use the CLI, you can read the wiki: http://forum.synology.com/wiki/index.ph ... ng_the_CLI

Basically, everything what you see after you type "cd /" is system partition, except the directory volume1, volume2, etc. which are mountpoints to data partitions.

I suggest that you start with "du -hs /var". /var is supposed to contain temporary (VARiable) data.
If the number that you get is not that big, scan all the directories with:
"du -hs /[a-u]*". This command will give you the size for each directory beginning with a letter from a to u.

Anyway, yes, 238MB is not much left, and IMHO it can cause problems. As you should have started with DSM 3.0/3.1, you should have at least 1GB of free disk for /dev/md0
DS-411 (DSM 4.2-3202) w/ 2x WD10EFRX + 1x HD154UI
DS-106j (DSM 3.0-1357), PATA-to-SATA adapter, 2.5" HM250HI
User avatar
maxxfi
Architect
Architect
 
Posts: 4328
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Espoo, Finland

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:14 pm

Maxx,
Var is less than 500kb, here's a screenshot

Image
adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby adam1v » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:19 pm

adam1v
Experienced
Experienced
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:43 pm

Re: 3.2 Beta for DS1511 Corrupt?

Postby maxxfi » Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:08 pm

Hm... I was expecting that /dev/md0 was about 2 GB of size, as it should be for DS installed with DSM 3.0 and newer. Or are those disks coming from an older NAS, like a DS409 ?
The values from 'du' command seem to be roughly ok, not much where you can trim any extra.
DS-411 (DSM 4.2-3202) w/ 2x WD10EFRX + 1x HD154UI
DS-106j (DSM 3.0-1357), PATA-to-SATA adapter, 2.5" HM250HI
User avatar
maxxfi
Architect
Architect
 
Posts: 4328
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: Espoo, Finland

Next

Return to DiskStation Manager 3.2 BETA - 1869

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: pure_energy1 and 0 guests